|
Log
Scales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ROW/COL |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
|
| 4 |
Frequently data is hard
to understand without using logs |
|
| 5 |
Here
is some Forecasted data for the next few years. Look at the graphs below |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Year |
Forecast |
|
Alternative way to express the # |
=LOG(C9) |
|
| 9 |
2000 |
10 |
1 |
10 ^1 |
|
| 10 |
2001 |
100 |
2 |
10 ^2 |
|
| 11 |
2002 |
1,000 |
3 |
10 ^3 |
|
| 12 |
2003 |
10,000 |
4 |
10 ^4 |
|
| 13 |
2004 |
100,000 |
5 |
10 ^5 |
|
| 14 |
2005 |
1,000,000 |
6 |
10 ^6 |
|
| 15 |
2006 |
10,000,000 |
7 |
10 ^7 |
|
| 16 |
2007 |
100,000,000 |
8 |
10 ^8 |
|
| 17 |
2008 |
1,000,000,000 |
9 |
10 ^9 |
|
| 18 |
2009 |
10,000,000,000 |
10 |
10 ^10 |
|
| 19 |
2010 |
100,000,000,000 |
11 |
10 ^11 |
|
| 20 |
2011 |
1,000,000,000,000 |
12 |
10 ^12 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
Here is one picture of
the data |
|
| 25 |
|
Notice that it is hard to
see what is going on. |
|
|
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Here is a picture using
the log scale |
|
| 56 |
Notice that you can see
the series is going straight up. |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
|

|
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
Using the logs of the
data rather than a log axis |
|
| 89 |
You see the same effects |
|
| 90 |
|
|
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|